If there's one thing the sport of horse racing desperately needs, it's positive publicity. Yet Penn National Race Course in Grantville, Pa. has probably generated more negative press than any other track within the last year, at a time when business and the racing product is on the upswing at the Grantville oval.
Things have dramatically improved at Penn National in the last three seasons. Purses have gone from about $65,000 per night to over $170,000 thanks to slots revenue, field sizes are among the highest in the country (averaging about 9.15 horses per race, according to the track), and the quality of horses competing in those races is also markedly better.
But Penn National has been caught in a firestorm of bad press due to a hot-button issue in the sport right now - the health and welfare of horses.
Because of the proximity of the New Holland livestock auction, located only 40 miles away, Penn National horsemen (and horsemen from other nearby tracks, Philadelphia Park included) often sent horses there that could no longer compete or were too slow. Most of the time, these horses were acquired by "kill buyers," who then shipped them to slaughter. There has been a sustained and vigorous effort, however, by several rescue groups in Pennsylvania and the surrounding region to prevent these horses from meeting such a horrendous fate, though many still do find themselves there. Last year, for instance, the horse Hagyard Branch (previously trained by Penn National-based Brandon Jenkins) and three horses formerly owned by Michael Gill and having last raced at Penn National - Sentimental Lisa, Flying Fortress, and Spiritual Call -were rescued.
Gill, as most of the country is now aware, was barred from racing at Penn National in early February, a controversy sparked by jockeys refusing to ride his horses due to safety concerns and questions about the ethical treatment of his animals. Press coverage was mind-boggling: At one point, doing a Google search for "Michael Gill" brought up nearly 1,000 articles that ran nationwide.
While other racetracks, including Philadelphia Park, adopted strict "no slaughter" policies and instituted their own rescue/retirement programs, Penn National did not have such measures in place ... until now. On March 29, Penn National Gaming, Inc. announced its own "no slaughter" policy, and intends to revoke the stalls of any horsemen who "knowingly, or without conducting proper due diligence, sells a horse for slaughter, directly or indirectly." This policy is now in effect for all of PNG properties - Zia Park, Charles Town, Bangor Raceway, Penn National and Toledo Raceway.
In the announcement, PNG vice president of racing Chris McErlean said that "We plan to assist our respective horsemen’s organizations in promoting and advertising available options.”
Given the success of Philadelphia Park's retirement program, Turning For Home, which recently placed its 350th horse, we asked Todd Mostoller, the executive director of the Pennsylvania HBPA, which represents Penn National horsemen, whether any plans were in the works for a similar program at the Grantville oval.
"We are looking at a number of possibilities regarding retirement programs," said Mostoller. "We will be visiting a number of programs in the next few months to see what will be the best fit for Penn National. These visits include Turning for Home, New Vocations, and the Finger Lakes program."
When it finally comes to fruition, such a retirement program will be a most welcome addition at Penn National, giving its owners and trainers a safe and humane outlet for horses who can no longer race. But just as importantly, it will generate some positive publicity for the track, and in the long run for the sport of horse racing itself.

The record needs to be set straight on the comments in this blog concering Penn National Race Horse retirment programs and Todd Mostaller stateing they are lookind at programs. The truth is the RACE Fund was implemented at Penn National in 2008,limited funds were provided by the HBPA and horses were saved and many went on to new careers. The fact is the HBPA did not fund the RACE Fund sufficiently to place as many horses as there were needing new homes and careers. Many horsemen were not able to place thier retires with us as we did not have the funding. the RACE Fund however has been blamed for not taking enough horses and yet we took all we could on funds provided. When I see a statement that Todd Mostaller is looking at Turning for Home as a option , it is a joke. the RACE Fund was first introduced to Michael Ballazzi at Philadelphia Park in 2008 and endorsed by him, he pledged $100,000 for start up and totaly reneged and instead took our business plan and turned it into Turning for Home right down to our sold with out pedigree and intake forms. So if immitation and plagiarizing is the best form of flattery, then hte RACE Fund has been flattered. No racehorse retirement program can run with out funds. no program can run on false pledges and false promises. the reason the Turning for Home program works is simple, on going funding. The Penn National HBPA had the best and original program already in place and did all they could to make it out to be a failure because they failed to fund us adaquately and reneged on money promised. Guess what , no program can be run on nothing . www.racefund.org Patricia Bewley , Vice President the RACE Fund
ReplyDelete